MEDICALODGES FORT SCOTT

Medicalodges Fort Scott is a skilled nursing facility located at 915 S Horton in Fort Scott, Kansas (ZIP: 66701), within Bourbon County. The facility operates under for-profit corporate ownership and is certified for both Medicare and Medicaid. It has a total of 45 certified beds, placing it among the smaller skilled nursing facilities in the region. According to the most recent CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) data, Medicalodges Fort Scott holds an overall star rating of 4 out of 5. This composite rating draws from three distinct domain ratings. The health inspection rating is 2 out of 5, which falls below the national average and reflects findings from standard annual inspections and complaint investigations conducted by state surveyors. The staffing rating is 5 out of 5, the highest possible score, indicating nurse and aide staffing levels that are among the strongest relative to resident census when compared to national benchmarks. The quality measure rating is also 5 out of 5, reflecting clinical outcome metrics such as rates of hospital readmission, medication management, and resident functional assessments that compare favorably to national standards. Medicalodges Fort Scott is certified to accept both Medicare and Medicaid as payment sources. This dual certification means the facility is available to residents who qualify for federal Medicare benefits, typically covering short-term skilled nursing or rehabilitation stays, as well as those who rely on Medicaid for long-term care funding. Individuals with private insurance or those paying out of pocket may also be eligible for admission, though specific coverage and admissions criteria should be confirmed directly with the facility by contacting them at (620) 223-0210. When compared to national averages, Medicalodges Fort Scott presents a mixed but generally above-average profile. The national average overall star rating is 3.0 out of 5, and this facility's overall rating of 4 places it above that benchmark. The staffing and quality measure ratings of 5 out of 5 both exceed national norms by a notable margin. The health inspection rating of 2 out of 5, however, is below the national average and may warrant closer review by those evaluating the facility for potential placement. Taken together, the CMS data provides a structured reference point for comparing this facility to others across the country, though on-site visits and direct inquiry remain important steps in any facility evaluation process.